Text Box: ACTION FOR UN RENEWAL
The campaign for the reform of the United Nations
 
97 Commercial Road, London E1 1RD                                                                                                  Email: vijay@vmpeace.org   
Tel: 020 7377 2111    Fax: 020 377 2999                                                                                  Website: action-for-un-renewal.org.
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Newsletter                                                                                                                    November 2007

 

Obituary – Jim Addington

 Jim Addington, Born, 1924 – Died, 21st June 2007.                              Vijay Mehta, acting chair, Action for UN Renewal

 Jim had a rather sketchy early education, going into the RAF at the end of the war. After which, he attended Ruskin College.
 He was a very keen athlete and won several cups for long distance and marathon running at a county level. He started a
small carpet business in the early 60s and then after marrying Rosemary in 1965, together they developed the business to
cover all aspects of soft furnishings. He refused to retire completely and still estimated for carpet installation up until the
end. 

He was a keen choral singer and lover of music, sang with Kingston Choral Society and was a regular attendee of the
Proms. He also enjoyed the theatre and walking in the countryside.

 In later life, Jim was a great peace activist and passionate about UN reforms. He was chair of Action for UN Renewal for many years, former chair of LRCND, an active member of UNA, Kingston Peace Council and LAP. He also wrote regularly in the Morning Star on UN reforms and international affairs.

 I enjoyed working with Jim as we used to plan the campaigns for Action for UN Renewal together and participated in meetings and conferences, especially the UNA and CND annual conferences. I remember the conference in Vancouver, Canada called the World Peace Forum, where Jim and I shared the platform on the subject of the UN Institutional reform and the whole proceedings were televised. I went with my wife Shanti, and Jim with Rosemary where we had some good times together.

 There were certain things that Jim was quite fond of doing. After the dinners at UNA or CND conferences, both of us used to go on long walks wherever the conference was being held to discuss the current international situation and reforms of the United Nations. After a few miles we used to end up back in the hotel at the dead of night, wake up the hotel staff and ask them to make hot chocolate! It wasn’t that we would have one cup of each, we would ask them to make a pot so we could have several.

 On coming back from one of the Birmingham conferences, just before we arrived at Euston Station, Jim asked me to hang on until all the passengers had left and then he started collecting the leftover newspapers from all of the compartments. He told me that he learned this habit from a member of parliament who used to collect all the different newspapers and write letters to the Editor. Once, my daughter, Renu rang me from Paris and asked me if I could pick her up from Waterloo. I, with my wife Shanti, went to Waterloo and we were having a cup of hot chocolate and there was Jim Addington. I asked him if he was going somewhere or coming back. He said no, I have just come to collect papers!
Jim has recruited me in following in his habit of collecting papers when I am leaving trains!

Jim, my great friend, we wish you peace and we will carry on the good work you were doing.

 Jim is survived by his wife, Rosemary who is a great peace activist in her own right and member of the peace council.

In this issue

Text Box: Upcoming meeting:
 Tuesday 4th December 2007, 7-9pm
House of Lords, Committee Room 4A
‘Bringing Democracy to Burma – What can the UK government do to promote and implement the rule of law and the UN Charter?’
Speakers 
Lord Peter Archer QC (President, World Disarmament Campaign)
John Rowley (Gandhi Foundation)
Anna Roberts (Burma Campaign UK)
 
 

 Jim Addington’s obituary                                         Vijay Mehta                       p.1                                                             

Climate change: how it impacts us all                  Vijay Mehta                      p.2                                              

Conclusion of the 62nd UN GA meeting                UN                                   p.2

Reforming the UN in the 21st century                    J. Schwartzberg /
                                                                                      J. Thring                          p.3/4                                                   

Erskine Childers Annual Memorial Lecture         Kate Allen / J Thring      p.4                                             

The West Balkans                                                    Luckshan Abeysuriya    p.5

The Rome Declaration of Nobel Peace Laureates                                      p.6

A Clear Blue Sky                                                       Noel Hamel                     p.7                                                               

Jim’s Funeral                                                           Christina Tyree                p.8                                              


 

Text Box: UN NEWS AND COMMENTS

 

 

 

Climate Change: How it impacts us all

 Report of the 60th Annual DP/NGO Conference

United Nations, New York, 5 -7 September 2007

Vijay Mehta

 Over 1,750 participants representing over 500 non-governmental organisations from more than 62 countries attended the 3-day conference at the United Nations headquarters. The packed agenda included roundtable sessions and workshops. Among the notable speakers was Asha-Rose Migiro, the UN deputy secretary-general, Achim Steiner, executive director for UNEPi, and Rajendra Pachuri, chairman of the IPCCii.  There were eminent speakers including representatives of member-states, UN agencies and programs, the scientific community, the private sector, media and civil society.

 There was a general recognition that our planet and environment is in peril and major catastrophes will follow if we do not take responsibility to protect ourselves and future generations. Global warming threats are real were reinforced by the latest scientific evidence from a wide variety of experts and from indigenous people.

 If the environment collapses, it will have catastrophic effects to Earth’s ecosystems and biodiversity. It will also reduce availability of food, water, energy and transport. It will increase massive migration of populations and the possible destruction of entire cultures and small island nations. It will also have significant damage to our economic, political, cultural, social life. Another effect of it will be an increase in violence and conflict. It will have negative impacts on human health and life expectancy and increase spread of vector-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue fever.

 There was a general feeling that an imminent framework for action should be adopted by governments at all level in cooperation with United Nations, NGO and civil society before threats become irreversible. The government, industry and UN leaders were urged to prioritise action on climate change and also to come up with a successor to Kyoto agreement which expires in 2012. It was pointed out that this should be done as a matter of urgency in the forthcoming UN climate change conference in Bali in December 2007.

 Speakers at different roundtable and workshops emphasised that:

·          all governments and civil society foster an ethical, moral foundation for ongoing sustainable development in our interdependent world making the well-being of all of humankind our priority.

·          all educational institutions and media organizations more effectively educate about the issue of climate change with special emphasis on youth,

·          governmental authorities consider penalties for excessive consumption and pollution as a method of financing climate change improvements, as well as financial incentives to foster climate-friendly technologies so that fossil fuel and nuclear based technologies can be phased out.

governments recognise that war is damaging to the climate.


 

Given the urgency of the many calls for action, it is now up to you to deliver in Bali, December 2007 (UNFCCC, Conference of the Parties).

 

Development

Overwhelming support to make quicker progress on the Millennium Development Goals was expressed by leaders from all regions. Many of the Goals are off-track, but in sub-Saharan Africa we may not achieve a single Goal by 2015. This is indeed an emergency situation.

Many developing countries set out domestic initiatives and new international partnerships to boost economic growth; to empower women and children; to provide better access to drugs to treat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases.

But many of you also recognised that a gap remains between promises and delivery on aid, trade and domestic reforms. Achieving the MDGs requires a global partnership with everyone fulfilling their part of the compact.

I am therefore grateful, that many of you supported convening an MDG Leaders Meeting this session. We must demonstrate by our actions that we can and will achieve the Goals.

 It was also evident that many delegations want to see further progress on Financing for Development as we move towards the Doha Conference in 2008.

 Many also pointed out the significance that concluding a global deal on trade would have on reducing poverty. We must press ahead during the existing round as many agree the current system is not sustainable.

                                                                        
International peace and security and human rights

 Terrorism in all forms was strongly condemned. There was strong support to ensure full implementation of the Counter Terrorism Strategy and a broad desire for swift progress on the Convention. In this context, many also emphasized the need to overcome ignorance and prejudice through a sustained dialogue among cultures and civilizations.

 On the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights many of you reaffirmed the importance of the promotion and protection of human rights for all. While some addressed the shortcomings of the Human Rights Council, others also called for its strengthening in order to live up to its full potential.

 In this context reference was also made to the importance to adherence to international law, human security and the responsibility to protect, all of these being complementary to sustainable development and peace and security.

 A wide range of issues of peace and security were raised.  In some areas we have taken some small, but concrete, steps in ongoing efforts to towards sustainable political solutions in the Middle East, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Darfur. Also, concerns were expressed about recent events in Myanmar.

 Positive developments were also reported in a number of post-conflict countries. In this regard, some delegations noted the positive contribution that UN peacekeepers had made, while others stressed the need to strengthen the capacity of the Peacebuilding Commission.

 There were also calls for better progress on disarmament, including, concluding an Arms Trade Treaty, and, that non-proliferation needed to be advanced. 

 

 

The Weighted Vote (WV) = (Population [expressed as a % of global total] + C [% share of total budget] + M [% share of population] ) / 3 [the number of measures]

 The US weighted vote (WV) would be (P4.6% + C22% + M0.5%)             = 27.17% / 3        = 9%

China's would be (20.87% + 1.51% + 0.52%)               = 22.38% / 3                                                                 = 7.63%

India would be                                                                      = 6%
Brazil                                                                                      = 1.9%
The Russian Federation                                                   = 1.3%

 Pie charts illustrated the much fairer shares of votes using the formula compared to the present.

Another measure was introduced to reflect the 'democratic' status' of each country, whether 'free', 'partially free' or 'not free', though this is a matter of opinion and dispute and not included.

 Economic Strength was divided into OECD, Group 77 countries and the rest.  The formula raised the representation of OECD countries from 16% to 41%, while Group 77 fell from 69% to 52% and the rest dropped from 16% to 8%.   This would oblige small countries to link together.  But this would still be unfair because wealthy nations have exploited poorer nations in the past and put them at a starting disadvantage.   Therefore it was proposed that up to say, 2025 the formula should be adjusted to double the population and economic contribution weights:

 WV = (2xP + 2xC + M) / 5

 The frequency of representation in the Security Council was also unfair.  A map showed how often each country had served as a non-Permanent Member.  40% of nations had never served, including Viet Nam with 85 million people, Israel and Saudi Arabia.  Conversely, some countries had served many times.  Most surprising was Panama; 6 times, Mexico; 5 times and Mauritius; 4 times. India had served 5 times.  It was likely that this was connected with their willingness to vote according to US wishes.

 A bar chart showed how the representation on the SC had changed since 1945.  The Permanent 5 had dropped from 18% to 8% of Member population, while the total population represented had grown in an 'S' curve to 2003. Only in 2 years did the SC represent more than 50% of world population.

 Hypothetical seats on the SC were under reform.  Many were puppets of former colonial powers.

A block of more than 4% of global population should qualify for a seat. It was for the General Assembly to vote on which blocks should be on the SC in a given year. For example, Africa as a block would get 18% of the seats whilst the US would only get 8%.  16 blocks would account for 90% of the world population.  An odd result is that Russia does not qualify for a seat.  So, for an interim period the Permanent 5 would be retained for 25 years, with 17 blocks.  There would be 18 seats on the SC for each block: the US, the Western League (Canada), Europe, Russia, Japan, China, West Asia (Islam), India, East Asia (ASEAN), Africa, the Arab League, Latin America, the Australian League and others [not noted].

 The ultimate formula would therefore become W = (P + C + 8.3% [17 as % total pop] ) / 3

 Conclusion: The Benefits of this formula would be:

1. Non-discriminatory
2. To give a voice for all on the SC
3. More realistic relative to the balance of powers
4. More balanced between 'haves' and 'have-nots' (50:50)

 

 

 

The IATT was taken up by the UN General Assembly which started to get agreements on it.  AI pressed the UK government to support it. 

[Sadly it concentrates on small arms which are the tools of the people against threats from armies, whilst scarcely affecting the heavy arms industry]

UN reform to respond to individual campaigners' pressure?   Kofi Annan focuses on the frailties of the UN in 'In Larger Freedom' . The Peace-building Commission was established.

AI tried to stop countries like Libya chairing the Human Rights Commission because it would cause difficulties. 

[What difficulties? Libya is guilty of far fewer human rights abuses than the USA, UK or Israel]

Special Procedures were established to facilitate reports by independent Human Rights advisers on specific areas.  They planned to include all countries.  The Council on Human Rights was now in its 5th Session.

Cuba, Sudan, Zimbabwe were guilty of human rights abuses.

[Cuba can hardly be singled out without mentioning Guantanamo Bay, a US torture camp of barbaric and patently lawless atrocities in another peoples' country; the very one being singled out!  Is this double standards, blindness or corruption by superpower pressure?] 

Iran and Sudan were ignoring the UN.

[Actually, Iran has complied with the UN over the extraordinary protocols placed on surveillance of her nuclear electric plans.  Sudan allowed the African Unity Force to enter the country to help in Dafur.  The major transgressors are the USA, the UK and Israel which have ignored or vetoed countless UN Resolutions, including hundreds on the occupation of Palestine. The also ignored the UN by invading Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Cuba]

The UK was not exempt from condemnation.  AI is arguing for rights for asylum seekers and fair trials.

Text Box: Contacts with members 
We are always interested in hearing from members and hope that our newsletters and meetings will become a vehicle for their views. Let us know what you have been doing and especially contacts with members of parliament.

 

 

 

 

 

 ‘The West Balkans – Emerging Threats and Future Opportunities’

 By Luckshan Abeysuriya- Author /Research Associate- Bosnia and West Balkans

 The Balkans has been called the Tinder - box of Inter - State and Intra State conflict in S-E Europe even before the First World War, when in 1914 the assassination of the Arch - Duke Ferdinand heir to the Hapsburgs throne killed by a Serb called Gavro- Principe in

Sarajevo precipitated the First World War in Europe

 The Slays dominated the area from the 8th century till the Ottoman empire held sway from the 15th century not only in the Balkans (Land of Blood) but great swath of West Europe with Constantinople as its epicentre with Religo- Ethnic competition to the once powerful Holy Roman empire.

 The influence of the Ottomans had far reaching impact on the Balkans, the spread of Islam and its geo-political and economic influence was most noticeable in what was the 6 Republics of

 

 

·          all governments ratify UN conventions on climate change, the Kyoto protocol and other relevant climate conventions

Other interconnected areas covered by the climate change conference were sustainable development, agriculture, forestry, issues affecting indigenous peoples, biodiversity, livestock and animal welfare, nuclear proliferation, the end of war, justice, ethnic groups, multigenerational issues, youth, gender equality, education, poverty, food and water security, culture of peace, interfaith cooperation, national global security and economic justice, as well as mental, spiritual and physical health.

It was a fantastic opportunity for networking with NGOs and civil society, UN officials and the media. 

i United Nations Environmental Programme

ii Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Conclusions of the 62nd UN General Assembly meeting

 United Nations Headquarters, New York, 3 October 2007

 There were almost 100 heads of states and governments as well as 80 ministers for foreign affairs who participated in a unique general assembly debate.

 Below are some of the remarks of the Srgjan Kerim, President of the 62th General Assembly, H.E. Dr.

 Climate change

 Responding to the challenge of climate change you have sent a strong political message that the time for talk has passed - that the time for action has begun.

 I believe an important shift has taken place. Climate change has become the flagship issue of the 62nd session.

 There was overwhelming consensus that while adapting to global warming we must not set limits to growth, but rather help achieve sustainable development.

 We all agreed that we have common but differentiated responsibilities. And rightly, there was broad consensus that the United Nations must remain at the centre of the process to reach a global agreement – including, to strengthen International Environmental Governance.

 Many of you also presented commendable initiatives: to reduce deforestation and emissions; invest in flood-prevention and food-security; introduce tougher energy efficiency standards; mobilise private sector investment in clean technologies; improve carbon-trading mechanisms; and, accelerate technology and resources transfers.

 The idea of a roadmap to coordinate the United Nations system on climate change, and to complement national efforts was endorsed by many.

 

The idea of fairer migration policies was mentioned. And some raised the growing links between organized crime, human trafficking and drugs. 

 

United Nations reforms

There is overall agreement that we could make faster progress on all these issues, if our multilateral institutions better reflected contemporary realities: underlining the need for better progress on United Nations reform.

The Secretariat must be more effective, efficient, and accountable to Member States – some of you put forward initiatives to achieve this. And, resources across the UN system must be mobilised and delivered more coherently on the ground.

We heard from those countries engaged in and supporting the ‘One UN’ approach that they are already seeing better results; and, others who support strengthening the gender architecture.

There was wide-ranging support for concrete results on Security Council reform, including through intergovernmental negotiations. 

------------------------------------------------------------

'Reforming the UN for the 21st Century'

Joseph Schwartzberg, Prof. Emeritus U. Minnesota
9th August 2007 at United Reform Church, Essex Street, London WC2Chair: Vijay Mehta

Report by our member, James B. Thring, Secretary, Ministry for Peace
jamesbthring@breathemail.net

Vijay Mehta introduced the speaker

Professor Schwartzberg wanted to modernise the UN, particularly the Security Council, by making it more democratic, more representative of the non-permanent member countries and fairer in terms of financial contributions.  This would effectively curb the autocracy of Permanent Members, especially the USA. [His talk was fully illustrated with clear and fascinating overheads, which were not available to take away and study, so allusions to them here are only for guidance.]

 Composition of the UN The original Members of the UN constituted 70% of the population.After 2003 many developing countries joined, changing the balance of power by population. But China with over 1000 x the population of Honduras was not adequately represented, having the same number of votes (1).  Therefore a weighted representation was needed on clear, valid principles: They should be objective, uniform and yet flexible and realistic.  They should represent democratic status, economic strength and contributions and other relevant measures.  In addition, the number of seats on the Security Council should be sufficient to be comprehensively representative but not so numerous as to be unmanageable.  The measures should be nuanced so that small changes in economy or population should not lead to large changes in voting power.

There should be an organic link between the Security Council and the General Assembly.

He advanced a formula to take account of some of these values for voting on the Security Council:

 

 


 



5. Encourage nations to pay their dues
6. Strengthen the voting power of democratic nations
7. Create regional consultation, transparency and accountability
8. To encourage more responsible national behaviour
9. Promote meritocracy and emergence of global statespersons
10. Accept revisions with changing circumstances


 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Erskine Childers Annual Memorial Lecture

'The growth and importance of individual action and its increasing influence in the field of human rights and United Nations reform'

Kate Allen, Director, Amnesty International (UK)

12th June 2007

Chair: Lord Peter Archer

Report by our member, James B. Thring, Secretary, Ministry for Peace
jamesbthring@breathemail.net

 Lord Archer introduced the speaker

Kate Allen noted that Amnesty International had 2 million members,

 significant support and following.  She began with a physics analogy of the search for a Universal Theory to explain everything in terms of atomic structures and interaction.  Individual action if coordinated by NGOs, was like the combined effect of atomic activity in producing [Planets]

Amnesty International had led the setting up of the International Criminal Court, the Treaty against Torture, the International Arms Trade Treaty and others.  This showed that individual non-governmental voices were getting through to the UN.   But reform is needed to turn this into action, in particular on the International Declaration on Human Rights.

AI was founded by Peter Benson, a lawyer, in 1961.  It had campaigned against the death penalty.  89 countries have abolished it so far.

The young are turned away from politics because it has been dominated by Party political wrangling. 

[They are perhaps disillusioned by the lack of sensitivity of politicians to both personal and global issues.  Party politics is out of date.  It has been overshadowed by a more sinister political divide, between the Judeo-Christian and the Muslim cultures]

The Sudan was being devastated by the Janjawid.  AI had tried to get the US, UN and EU to intervene. 

 [The underlying problem is poverty in Chad, Central African Republic and Rwanda, pushing people into Sudan, upsetting farmers struggling on the border in Darfur.  It is aggravated by the US which is worried about China drilling for oil and helping the local people with real economic and infrastructure benefits and winning Third World support]

AI sponsored UN Resolution 1325 on 'Women's Peace & Security'

 

 

 

 

Yugoslavia and two autonomous area arid further East to Albania and Turkey.

The Ottomans collapse after the fall of Constantinople in early 20th century to be replaced by the Austro- Hungarian empire left indelible marks on the civilisation and culture of the Balkans.

During the Second World War, the Balkans ruptured again where the Croats supported the Axis powers, whilst Serbia- Montenegro and Bosnia and Hezegovina opposed the Nazis and Mussolini.

The mistrust and rivalry of the Second World affected and re- ignited old ethnic and religious divisions in the Balkans, Only Marshal Tito was able to hold these fissiporous tendencies from erupting into conflict. Tito was a unifying influence which kept The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia both Socialist and prosperous as a centralized Economic entity.

After Tito’s death in 1980, Ethnic- Nationalism erupted with Milosevic’s dream of a Greater (Slavic) Serbdom a passionate rallying force, this alarmed the Croats and Bosnian Muslims and Macedonia, Kosova and even Montenegro who did not wish to be part of a greater Serbia driven by the Orthodox Slav Church and rabid nationalism.

During 1991-5 there where 3 Balkans Wars which nearly destroyed the infrastructure of the West Balkans, many Human Rights Tragedies like Srebrenica 1995 and prior in Vukovar and Krajina in 1992-3 resulted in vast killings and internally displaced peoples of over 2 million to be the direct result. Ethnic Cleansing, Rape and Extra - Judicial killing and Torture were common-place. NATO bombing and Intervention by the West mitigated some of the killing but it exacerbated relations delicately fostered by Titoism. Some commentators are of the view- the collapse of the Soviet Union left the Balkans too vulnerable to Western Capitalism and neo- Nationalism.

The UN Tribunal for War Crimes in Former Yugoslavia established by the Security Council 1993 is still sitting to-day in The Hague 14 years after, attempting to mete out International Justice and compensation for the peoples of Bosnia, Kosovo and Croatia, with two of the principal Serb- Bosnian war criminals Radovan Karadizic and Rakto Mladic still at large where even NATO troops are unwilling to arrest them in view of Serbia patronage.

Reconciliation and Restitution is not possible in the Balkans until justice is meted out and Self - determination is addressed. Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania are flash points to the security architecture in the Balkans. In Kosovo the UN- plan for a “supervised Independence” is opposed by Serbia with Russia threat to veto the Martti Ahtisaari plan

All the new countries that re-emerged out of the collapse of Former Yugoslavia have one ambition,  that is join the European Union. Slovema is already a member of the EU and Croatia hope to accede in the next round with perhaps, Albania and even Kosovo and the

Former Republic of Macedonia who are having stabilisation and Accession talks with Brussels near ready. Serbia, Bosnia and Montenegro’s chances are bleaker due to War Criminals, poor Human rights record and other weak governance criteria for entry

The future of the Balkans is linked to the membership of the now 27 member Union, perhaps all 6 Balkans candidates could accede to the EU, in the next decade, There is hope then that the Balkans may become a vast trading entity and old ethic divisions may simmer to the background-- that is an optimistic scenario for political and ethnic stability affecting the whole of Europe

 

 

Text Box: Action for UN Renewal AGM 
 Watch out for the date in February 2008.
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

We need to eliminate nuclear weapons says 

The Rome Declaration of Nobel Peace Laureates

 The 7th World Summit of Nobel Peace Laureates took place in Rome from November 17 to 19 and was held, as were previous Summits, on the initiative of Mikhail Gorbachev and the Mayor of Rome, Walter Veltroni.

 We, Nobel Peace Laureates and Laureate Organizations, gathered in Rome, Italy, have for years been deeply disturbed by the lack of public attention and political will at the highest levels of state paid to the need to eliminate nuclear weapons. There are over 27,000 of these devices threatening civilization, with over 95% in the hands of Russia and the US. This danger threatens everyone and thus every person must work to eliminate this risk before it eliminates us.

We oppose the proliferation of nuclear weapons to any state. We are faced each day with a new crisis in proliferation exemplified by concerns regarding North Korea and Iran. However, our focus must be on the weapons themselves for the only sustainable resolution to gain security is the universal elimination of the weapons.

The failure to address the nuclear threat and to strengthen existing treaty obligations to work for nuclear weapons abolition shreds the fabric of cooperative security. A world with nuclear haves and have-nots is fragmented and unstable, a fact underscored by the current threats of proliferation. In such an environment cooperation fails. Thus, nations are unable to address effectively the real threats of poverty, environmental degradation and nuclear catastrophe.

Nuclear weapons are more of a problem than any problem they seek to solve. In the hands of anyone, the weapons themselves remain an unacceptable, morally reprehensible, impractical and dangerous risk. The use of a nuclear weapon against a state without nuclear weapons is patently immoral. Use against a state with nuclear weapons is also suicidal. These weapons have no value against terrorists or criminals. Progress toward a safer future is not thwarted from a lack of practical, threat-reducing policy options. The problem is a lack of political will.

As Nobel Peace Prize Laureates we commit to work collectively to achieve the elimination of nuclear weapons, which we believe are unworthy of civilization.

We have heard the impassioned warning from the Mayor of Hiroshima and survivors of the atomic bombs and join him and the over 1500 cities around the world, including Rome, in their call to all nations, including those with nuclear weapons arsenals – US, Russia, France, China, UK, Israel, India, and Pakistan – to immediately commence negotiations to obtain the universal, legally verifiable elimination of nuclear weapons. In past years we have set forth practical steps to bring us to such a better world, and we

reiterate the need for such policies as a entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, de alerting of the hair trigger launch on warning arsenals of thousands of hazardous weapons deployed now by Russia and the US, obtain stricter IAEA controls over nuclear materials, and pledges never to use a nuclear weapon first. Such efforts will help to ensure that nuclear capabilities are denied to terrorists.

We issue a serious warning that without such efforts the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (NPT) could corrode opening the way for dozens of states to become nuclear armed, a frightening prospect. The NPT is a bargain in which non-proliferation is obtained based on a promise by nuclear weapons states to negotiate nuclear weapons elimination and offer peaceful uses of nuclear technology. There is a fundamental dilemma which must end. Nuclear weapons states want to keep their weapons indefinitely and at the same time condemn others who would attempt to acquire them. Such flaunting of disarmament obligations is not sustainable.

The current situation is more dangerous than during the Cold War. We are gravely concerned regarding several current developments such as NPT stakeholders enabling rather than constraining proliferation, modernization of nuclear weapons systems, the aspiration to weaponize space, thus making arms control and disarmament on earth all the more difficult, and the declared policy of terrorist organizations to obtain nuclear weapons.

Given the critical nature of the situation, we pledge to challenge, persuade and inspire Heads of State to fulfil the moral and legal obligation they share with every citizen to free us from this threat. We declare our intention to participate fully in a world summit where leaders of culture, arts, sciences, business, and politics, will actively participate.

As Nobel Peace Laureates, conscience requires us to raise our voices, inspire humankind, and to demand change in state policies. We call upon the citizens of the world to join us in this work.

 

 

not unusually in Japan
in August it was a warm sunny day with
a clear china blue cloudless sky; and though it was still early
in the day it was mild and warm as only a late summer morning can be.
It had been one of those nights when those, lucky enough to have a verandah,
had been able to sleep under cover outside in the balmy night air. Others had merely
flung their windows wide to get the benefit of any ventilation to cool them as they slept.
Had it not been for the wartime austerity, the oppressive sadnesses of mothers who had lost
sons, wives who had lost husbands, children who had lost fathers and whole families who were
without menfolk; that and the hunger from lack of basic foodstuffs, it would have been a grand
time to be alive. Wartime hardship had brought people together, friendships blossomed, it was not unusual for people to share their troubles, their food or other commodities, and their good fortune such as the occasional piece of meat, come by from a relative or friend with a farm.
People gave each other mutual support, partly out of a feeling of genuine empathy
and partly out of a mutual feeling of comradeship – everyone in it
together. What sense would there be in doing otherwise?
This was not the time for people to be
merely looking out for themselves.
Everyone knew that deprivation
was far easier to endure when
everyone felt part of a friendly
community which embraced them;
would provide care and support should
pain or hardships threaten to overwhelm
them. This was what in Britain
was
called the ‘wartime spirit’, the
camaraderie of ordinary
people in wartime
enduring hardship
not of their own
making but forced
upon them by rulers
who believed that ordinary
people were theirs to do with
as they wished, whilst they pursued
their own ambitions of conquest and dominance.
No one really knew what was going on as the news
was ‘managed’ by the administration, or the military
to be more precise. Of course there were always
stories glorifying our beloved Hirohito
which was supposed to make
us feel that sacrifice
was worthwhile
though really
we knew little
of what our
brave soldiers
were fighting for;
nor how things were
going or when it would end.
We all wanted to see an end to the
shortages, and a time when our men would
return and normal life be restored. That day our
citizens went to work or school as usual despite lack of
food. People used bicycles and trams or walked across our
bustling city just as countless millions do all over the world.
There was nothing special or different about anything in
Hiroshima that day – just ordinary people going about
their ordinary lives. There had been an alarm and
we had taken what little shelter we
could. It had passed and
now we just got
on with our
busy daily
routines.

Sure, there was a plane overhead, a single plane, probably just looking around. No one took any particular notice. We weren’t a military target. Little did we realise that we were seconds away from total elimination. We and our entire city would disappear and in our place would be total destruction; thousands barely human; grey gaunt, agonisingly dying; and dust, dust, dust;

A HUGE BLACK MUSHROOM CLOUD AND POISONOUS BLACK RAIN OUT OF 

A CLEAR BLUE SKY.

 In memory of Jim Addington, peace campaigner; died 21 June 2007. Noel Hamel. 5/10/07.       

 

JIM’S FUNERAL, (July 6th)

 On a warm and sunny day with a light breeze, many friends and relatives gathered in a field designated as a “Green” burial place in the countryside just outside Guildford to pay their respects to and say their goodbyes to Jim Addington who died on 21st June while on holiday with his wife Rosemary in Cornwall, a place he knew and loved. (Obituary in July/August Peace).

 When I arrived with Rae Street, I looked around to see whom I recognised. Men in dark suits and ties and plenty of grey beards mixed with ladies in flowery skirts and brightly-coloured tops — we had been told it was OK to wear cheerful clothes. Many of the faces I didn’t know. Jim had other interests as well as peace: he loved music. sang in a choir and enjoyed long-distance running. He also had an extended family of nephews and great nieces who were present along with faces  recognised - Pat Allen, Richard Crump, Tim Wardle, Joan Horrocks, Laurie Bielby and Jill Hurle.

 This was a Humanist ceremony, conducted by a lady. She asked us to come through into the field. A black car had pulled into it and a brown cardboard coffin was resting on a stand. I had never been to anything like this before and I was slightly scared. There was nothing like an order of service sheet and it was slightly surreal with more of a feel of a picnic or an open-air concert than a funeral. Everyone gathered round and since the crowd was about four to five deep I couldn’t see all that well. I was able to see the Humanist lady who was leading the service. She explained that Humanists do not follow a set creed but believe in humanity and that the ceremony was in line with what Jim had wanted. She said that we are all leaves of the tree of life which grows, flourishes but has to cope with storms as well as the sun and leaves then drop off. We were here to remember Jim and people would have the opportunity to contribute to the ceremony.

 As the weather had been very unpredictable all week she said that should the heavens open she would move swiftly to the burial and then we would continue the readings and poems back at the pub. Fortunately this didn’t happen — the sun even came out and it was quite warm. Some of the older people found standing in the field for an hour too much and one or two sat on the bonnets of cars and one or two got out folding chairs. A nephew spoke and began with my favourite quotation: “All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to .do nothing.” Vijay Mehta then spoke about Jim’s work with the Action for UN Renewal Campaign. Joan Horrocks read beautifully a poem entitled “One day.” (“One day there will be no more war...’ etc.) The Humanist lady spoke about Jim’s life. I was surprised to learn that he was an old boy of Tiffin School (a very posh boys’ public school) and that he was at Ruskin College, Oxford (further education college for mature students). He had once been a member of the Young Conservatives! This was, he had said, for the social activities. He didn’t follow an academic route, running his own carpet company together with Rosemary up until his death.

 There were several other poetry contributions as well as one from Rosemary herself, who joined in making comments and giving contributors hugs as the ceremony progressed. Several of Jim’s peace friends read out a scene from a little play that Jim had written (to do with Iraq and the lack of WMD) with characters Tonius, Gordonius and Hoonius and people laughed. Unlike what I would expect at a funeral, people were remembering Jim in a cheerful way and there was none of the oppressive atmosphere one usually gets in the traditional set-up. People were invited to come forward and write messages on the cardboard coffin and while this was happening Mahler music was coming from a tiny ipod and speakers. A small butterfly fluttered by and someone said it was Jim’s spirit. Then the cardboard coffin was lowered quickly into the grave and we were all asked to throw our flowers in. They thudded on to the top of the box. Vijay looked at us and said, “Shall we go to the pub?” As I got back into the “people carrier” I was brought in, an elderly lady said “Bye, bye Jim.”

 We then went to the Red Lion pub. It was a lovely old country pub and the guests at the wake drank the wine which Rosemary had kindly provided as well as helping themselves to large trays loaded with sandwiches and quiche. A lady handed round copies of an obituary for Jim in the Surrey Comet and there were also old scrap books and photograph albums which were passed around. People then chatted amongst themselves and to Rosemary and she had a lot of hugs. People remembered what Jim did and what he gave to the campaigns and the friendship he gave to others he came into contact with. People mingled and chatted to others they had not met before as well as to those they had and in that way were able to get a fuller feel of Jim and all the various things he had been involved in. It was a positive experience to honour and appreciate a special man that we will all remember.

 Christina Tyree.

  Action for United Nations Renewal

  Patrons: Tony Benn, Bruce Kent, Caroline Lucas     MEP.

 Committee members:
 Acting chair: Vijay Mehta
 Vice-chairs: Ailsa Moore, Prue Wendt. 
 Secretary: Kate Hodgson
 Membership & Treasurer: Carol Langdon
 Website organiser: Karl Miller
 Donald Prentice, Maureen O’Mear
 M A Qavi  
 Gordon Glass
 Rosemary Addington
 Luckshan Abeysuriya

 

 

Join Action for UN Renewal now. Email: carollangdonuk@yahoo.co.uk

 Annual subscription: £10.00; unwaged £5.00; groups £10.00;

Action for UN Renewal enquires to Carol Langdon (membership and treasurer).
Address:
97 Commercial Road, London, E1 1RD

 

 

Your suggestions for topics, speakers and comments on the newspaper are welcome.

 Newspaper committee:  Vijay Mehta
                                       Kate Hodgson